The public information records a teaching activity
An activity draft published by Education Window on October 26 and marked as the source of Wenzhou Open University introduced the school's invitation to Wenzhou Huanteng Culture Technology Co., Ltd. to participate in OPC and FDE practical lectures, and explained how to write business rules into executable documents using attendance. This article uses activity facts and does not write classroom tasks as projects that have passed corporate production acceptance.
ChinaOPC analysis: The rule should be able to correspond to a record
Assuming that the business staff proposes "listing exception attendance separately", it is also necessary to confirm what circumstances the exception contains, what is the basis for judgment, and which records should be handed over to manual work. When writing verbal requirements into documents, you can provide a desensitized example for each situation to allow business personnel to confirm whether the output meets the original intention.
If there is a lack of evidence, it should remain pending verification. There is not a punch record in the data, which is not enough for AI to determine the cause on its own; rule interpretation and subsequent processing should be decided by authorized business personnel. This article discusses data collection and software delivery and does not replace the company's personnel judgment.
What information should be included in the executable document?
You can write clearly the input fields, processing sequence, output location and exception destination. Each rule describes which version of the data to use and uses examples to demonstrate expected results. Documentation should also indicate which actions simply generate a draft and which require confirmation before proceeding, to avoid directing the exercise process to real employee records.
After students or delivery personnel run through it independently, let people who did not participate in the writing try to execute it according to the document and record where it stopped and what instructions are missing. This can help discover parts that "the author knows but has not written in the document" and also makes the process easier to hand over.
From the classroom to the enterprise, what verification is still missing?
Classroom samples are often limited in scope. Before actual deployment, data permissions, field changes, processing capacity and exception processes need to be reconfirmed and trial run within a controlled range. The original data and the output results should be able to correspond item by item. When adjusting the rules, the before and after versions should be retained, and the final table cannot be replaced.
The acceptance can arrange a normal processing, a missing field and a rule adjustment to see if the person taking over can explain what happened. Training, trial operation and formal business results are recorded separately, so that the next stage can be discussed. For more examples of administrator handover, please refer to How to accept FDE training.