Every step of a founder's journey deserves a record.Founders · AI · PolicyCHINAOPC / ENGLISH EDITION

Comparing Three AI Services: Customers, Experience and Delivery Conditions

AI advertising, professional courses or enterprise customization, which one is more suitable for your experience and customer conditions? This article combines the public materials of three entrepreneurs, compares customer problems, existing resources and delivery responsibilities, and sorts out the gaps in quotations, rework and payment collection materials to help readers make a complete sample first and then judge the direction, instead of selecting projects only based on the reported amount.

Chinese edition published 16 Oct 2026 · 阅读中文原文 ↗

Source timing2026-07-16

The public materials of Zhou Wenqiang, Gu Yanyan and Zheng Junyou respectively provide three observation entrances: commercial advertisements, AI+HR courses and enterprise customized solutions. They are not the same product, nor can they be ranked by reported revenue into universal entrepreneurial priorities. This article compares the operating conditions that have been disclosed and does not rank the projects.

Let’s look at the customer problem first. Advertising services need to turn commercial expressions into films, courses are organized and delivered around professional tasks and learning content, and corporate customization requires understanding of production scenarios. ChinaOPC analysis: These differences will change the workload of communication, verification and maintenance. Tools can be used across scenarios, but what customers are willing to accept needs to be explained in their respective businesses.

Look at the existing resources. Zhou Wenqiang’s report involves visual communication learning and platform order support; Gu Yanyan’s interview involves long-term industry experience and contact accumulation; Zheng Junyou’s report emphasizes entering the workshop to understand needs. None of these conditions can be obtained by purchasing a tool, nor should they be omitted from the entrepreneurial story.

Finally, look at evidence gaps. The existing materials do not provide comparable order-by-order prices, total labor and outsourcing investment, refund rework, payment cycle and profit information for the three types of businesses. Different metrics for monthly, annual, or single sales are also not directly comparable. Therefore, this article does not create revenue rankings or extrapolate industry success rates from individual experiences.

For readers who are preparing to start a business, the next step that is more feasible is to first select a customer problem that you understand, sort out your existing capabilities, and then use fictional materials to create a complete delivery example. This suggestion belongs to the research path proposed by ChinaOPC, and the transaction effect has not yet been verified. Cases help form a list of questions, and whether a real business is established still depends on subsequent facts.

Sources and editorial notes

Data compilation date: 2026-10-16; data deadline: 2026-10-16. Based on independent comparisons of three sets of public information, no interviews, no audits, and no customer transactions were conducted; the comparative conclusions and local practice recommendations are ChinaOPC analysis, not revenue forecasts. AI-assisted data compilation and writing; original text is organized independently, and the verification scope is as above. English translation of the Chinese edition, prepared with machine assistance and editorial checks. Source verification dates refer to the original Chinese research.

Source titles and publisher names are retained in their original language. Refer to the linked originals for official documents and current requirements.

← Back to OPC InsightsEditorial standards ↗