Updating Case Research: Preserve Earlier Dates and Record Corrections

New pages do not automatically erase history

The number of entrepreneurs, product features, and policy arrangements will all change over time. The current introduction of the official website is suitable for explaining the currently visible content, while the historical interview records the past time. When the two are inconsistent, the time and caliber should be identified first, rather than silently changing the old facts.

Updates require knowing what has changed

Save source titles, dates and links to associate new facts with original records. For important corrections, explain where the original inaccuracies were, what the basis was, and when they were revised; for normal business changes, retain the original time point to avoid giving readers the illusion that "it has always been this way."

The knowledge base also needs to clarify the data owner, review frequency and invalidation handling. When the model retrieves an old version, it should have a recognizable state, rather than just guessing that the content is still valid based on the last update time. Web page modification itself cannot prove that a certain processing or business result has occurred.

Let readers have a path back to the basis

Provide original sources and necessary boundaries to separate editorial judgment from source facts. This not only helps search and understand, but also facilitates users to find errors. Extended reading: Website change monitoring.