Every step of a founder's journey deserves a record.Founders · AI · PolicyCHINAOPC / ENGLISH EDITION

BGE-M3: Combining Keyword and Semantic Search for Product Information

BGE-M3 incorporates dense, sparse and multi-vector retrieval capabilities into the same model, and is suitable for studying data queries that have both model numbers and natural language descriptions. Starting from the industrial product catalog, this article explains how exact matching and semantic matching work together, how to deal with new and old data and missing answers, and reminds readers to use practical problems to evaluate whether complex retrieval is worth maintaining.

Chinese edition published 23 Oct 2026 · 阅读中文原文 ↗

Source timingVerified version: BAAI/bge-m3; representative search model published in 2024, this article is a basic introduction; data verified on October 23, 2026.

Three types of search capabilities solve different problems

The BGE-M3 model card released by Beijing Zhiyuan Artificial Intelligence Research Institute introduces three search capabilities: dense, sparse and multi-vector, and lists 1024-dimensional vectors and 8192 sequence lengths. This model is oriented to multi-language data retrieval and is a representative model that was released earlier. This article does not describe it as a new product released on that day.

Dense retrieval can be understood as searching for materials based on semantic similarity, while sparse retrieval pays more attention to term matching, and multi-vector methods provide more fine-grained comparisons. The exact effect depends on the material and implementation, and combining more patterns does not automatically mean that all queries will be more accurate.

In the industrial catalog, the model number cannot be replaced carelessly (ChinaOPC analysis)

When a user searches for a string of precise model numbers, one letter difference may correspond to another product; when a user searches for "equipment suitable for humid environments," he or she needs to understand the description. A product catalog can retain precise field indexing and semantic retrieval at the same time, allowing both types of problems to take appropriate search paths.

Having clear fields for model, make, version, and unit is easier to control than piecing it all into one big block of text. For inquiries about a specified model, you can first check whether the model exists, and then expand to similar products; similar results must indicate the difference, and users cannot mistakenly think that they are the same product.

How to judge whether a hybrid solution is valuable

First sort out three groups of questions: accurate numbering, spoken description, and requirements that do not exist in the library. Record one by one whether the correct results appear and where they are ranked, as well as which mismatches are likely to cause business misunderstandings. Only by trying basic search and combined search respectively can you know what problems the new complexity solves.

If the data itself lacks purpose, applicable conditions, or specifications, the retrieval model cannot reliably compensate for these facts. You can improve the directory content first and then adjust the sorting; otherwise, the model may only display incomplete information faster and still require repeated confirmation by the user.

When updating information, the search basis must also be updated.

Each result retains the data date, version and source file, and sets the identifiable status for abolished content. Index updates should record additions, modifications and deletions to avoid old products that have been removed from the shelves but still appear in the recommended results. The isolation of permissions and customers should also be implemented by system rules.

For the OPC team, it can start from catalog cleaning and retrieval verification of a product category, and deliver a list of materials, problem samples and maintenance methods. This article does not promise purchase conversion rate or retrieval accuracy, and the model performance needs to be tested in actual databases.

Further reading

Understand the division of labor between querying and reranking; Compare Granite Enterprise Components. For more introduction, please see AI Model Column.

Sources and editorial notes

AI-assisted organizing and writing. The model information is based on the official information at the end of the article; the application process, task examples and acceptance suggestions are original analyzes by ChinaOPC. The model performance evaluation has not been run, and the hypothetical project has not been written as a delivered case. English translation of the Chinese edition, prepared with machine assistance and editorial checks. Source verification dates refer to the original Chinese research.

Source titles and publisher names are retained in their original language. Refer to the linked originals for official documents and current requirements.

← Back to AI ModelsEditorial standards ↗