Every step of a founder's journey deserves a record.Founders · AI · PolicyCHINAOPC / ENGLISH EDITION

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: Counting the Costs of Cross-Tool Tasks and Development

MiniMax introduced M3.1 Flash on October 19, focusing on tool collaboration, software development and computer operation. This article focuses on a customer data compilation task, explains the division of labor between models and software permissions, and discusses failed retries, manual reviews, and task costs; the officially announced efficiency data is a manufacturer's explanation and does not directly replace ChinaOPC delivery testing.

Chinese edition published 23 Oct 2026 · 阅读中文原文 ↗

Source timingVerified version: MiniMax M3.1 Flash; official release date October 19, 2026; official data verified on October 23, 2026.

What was posted

MiniMax released M3.1 Flash on October 19. Officially, it lists complex tool tasks, code development and Computer Use as capability directions, and provides API, M Plan and MiniMax Code entrances. The announcement states that the model weights will be made available at a later date, so this release alone cannot make it an open source weight that can be downloaded immediately.

The difference between computer operation and ordinary conversation

Computer Use refers to the model combining tools and interfaces to complete operations, such as selecting next step after reading the form status. The model can propose click actions, but there is still a gap between the reliable completion of the entire task: website login, timeout, page changes and software permissions will all affect the results. Answering it correctly once does not prove that it will continue to handle an entire batch of work.

Which type of entrepreneurial work is worth trying first (ChinaOPC analysis)

The operation service team can start with internal data archiving: classify authorized customer documents by project, extract the fields that need to be completed, and generate a to-do list. First use a read-only input and a separate output directory, and then decide whether to synchronize it to the official system after the person in charge checks it. This way, it is easy to find at which step the model starts to deviate from the target.

When incorporating customer email delivery, actual payment, or overwriting of original documents into the process, additional confirmation points from the designer are required. The so-called cross-tool collaboration does not mean that every action should be performed automatically; a reliable service should be able to indicate whether it is currently read, drafted, pending confirmation, or completed.

Costs are recorded based on completed tasks

You can select ten data of different complexity and record the number of successes, waiting time, call volume, number of retries and manual revision time. If a low unit price model is redone repeatedly, the overall expenditure may not be low; if a complex model reduces manual rework, it may be more suitable. Here are the evaluation methods, not the results of the Hengping evaluation that has been completed in this article.

How to access and review

Confirm the actual package and model identification through the official portal, and keep the task log and output version. The speed and cost improvements in the announcement come from vendor testing and depend on workload and comparison baselines. Use your own sample test before making an external quotation, and include tool service fees, storage costs and maintenance investment into the budget.

Continue to compare

Compare the task distribution of the GPT series; Understand the office collaboration of Tencent Hunyuan. You can also browse the AI model column.

Sources and editorial notes

AI-assisted organizing and writing. The model capabilities are based on the following official information, and the task selection and verification method is ChinaOPC original analysis; no paid API horizontal evaluation is performed, and the manufacturer's self-test, example or preview capabilities are not written as actual test delivery results. English translation of the Chinese edition, prepared with machine assistance and editorial checks. Source verification dates refer to the original Chinese research.

Source titles and publisher names are retained in their original language. Refer to the linked originals for official documents and current requirements.

← Back to AI ModelsEditorial standards ↗