First confirm in which scenario the project has been used
On October 10, the Jiangsu Provincial Disabled Persons' Federation issued a solicitation notice for application scenarios of technology to assist the disabled, covering seven directions including living assistance, rehabilitation, education and training, employment and entrepreneurship. The notice requires real implementation, normalized trials and verification, including pilot trials of scientific research prototypes and grassroots application of industrial products. Projects that only make demands but do not have carriers, trials and actual service targets are not within the scope of this acceptance.
In the early morning of October 21, the provincial submission deadline had not yet arrived. A demo page or product plan is still not enough to qualify. The AI team can first find out who is using the project and where it is running, and then confirm with the recommending unit whether it is suitable for this round. This article provides reading guidance and does not qualify the project.
Ordinary enterprises and alliance members have different reporting paths.
This solicitation is open to relevant service agencies, members of the Provincial Science and Technology Disability Assistance Alliance, and relevant enterprises and institutions that carry out innovative practices in science and technology assistance to the disabled in the province and have real application scenarios. The notice also clarified that each district-city Disabled Persons' Federation is responsible for case collection, preliminary review and unified submission within its jurisdiction, and does not accept direct individual submissions from market entities such as enterprises in the jurisdiction; member units of the Provincial Science and Technology Disability Alliance can submit directly as required.
Therefore, after seeing the provincial receiving mailbox, it is not appropriate to skip the territorial preliminary review. First confirm whether you are indeed a member of the alliance, and then ask about the local receiving arrangements for materials; before October 31st, it is the provincial node listed in the notice, and you cannot assume that the local area will always receive the materials on the same day. The small team headcount provided by ChinaOPC cannot replace this object and practical conditions.
A piece of material describing what has happened and what is going to be done.
The official application form requires filling in the recommendation, applying unit and selected direction. The scenario overview is limited to 300 words, and the scenario introduction, iterative technology status and expected effects after opening are each limited to 100 words. The notice also requires the provision of supporting evidence such as implementation results, real-life applications and operational data. Please refer to the original link for the complete form and notice.
The following is the ChinaOPC organizing method. The materials can be divided into actual usage records, technical changes and follow-up plans first, and then filled in according to the requirements of the original form. The functions that have been used describe the service objects and usage environment; the capabilities that are to be added remain in the planning status. Expectations for future promotions should not be filled in with current operating results.
For example, if you simulate a team that has assisted the employment service station in organizing training materials, you can first record the actual users, tasks and areas that still require manual help. If you plan to access accessible Q&A in the next step, it should be explained that it has not yet been implemented, and you cannot write that the ability to generate answers means that the service has been improved. This scenario is not a selected case in the notice, nor does it prove that such projects will necessarily meet the solicitation requirements.
In addition to technical demonstration, it also depends on whether the user can complete the task.
For existing AI disability assistance services, the team can review specific tasks with actual users and service agencies: whether the input method is appropriate, whether the information obtained is understandable, and whether there is someone to take over when difficulties are encountered. Different usage environments need to be observed separately, and one trial by a team member cannot replace the continuous use of the real object. The above is ChinaOPC’s analysis, with unofficial new review terms.
When preparing supporting evidence, each effect can be matched with the recording period, scope of use and data basis. If there are not enough records, the unknown should be kept truthfully, and the number of people, promotion ratio or social effects should not be added based on the product introduction. The team should also confirm the authenticity, intellectual property rights and display scope of the materials, and organize necessary information according to actual uses.
Opportunities after storage needs to be continuously checked
The notification arranges expert review and classification selection, and selects the best ones for inclusion in the resource library, and uses relevant scenarios as important references for demonstrations, pilots, and government procurement. Selection and subsequent implementation are different stages. Submission does not mean warehousing, and warehousing does not mean that there is a procurement contract.
Extended reading: How does a project retain a checkable delivery basis; When should AI customer support be handed over to manual processing; How to check local conditions separately with the people served by the platform.